From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "vijaysam(at)mailworks(dot)org" <vijaysam(at)mailworks(dot)org>, "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #13757: Able to write to postgres even when the main process has been killed |
Date: | 2015-11-06 16:58:05 |
Message-ID: | 21282.1446829085@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thursday, November 5, 2015 1:11 PM, "vijaysam(at)mailworks(dot)org" <vijaysam(at)mailworks(dot)org> wrote:
>> when I try to kill -9 the master server main postgres process.
>> The client code from java is able to continue to write to the
>> postgres db which was the old master as there was a connection
>> established to this server and the connection keeps allowing
>> write to happen as thought the server is still running.
> Before reporting a bug it is a good idea to check whether a fix for
> it is available.
IIUC, the OP is complaining about the fact that backends will keep running
even if the postmaster has died. That's not a bug, but the designed
behavior. There's been some recent discussion of changing it, but if it
does change it will only be in HEAD not back branches.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-11-06 17:21:50 | Re: Re: BUG #13685: Archiving while idle every archive_timeout with wal_level hot_standby |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2015-11-06 16:52:35 | Re: Re: BUG #13685: Archiving while idle every archive_timeout with wal_level hot_standby |