Re: Propose RC1 for Friday ...

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, "Ross J(dot) Reedstrom" <reedstrm(at)rice(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Propose RC1 for Friday ...
Date: 2002-11-14 20:35:31
Message-ID: 21254.1037306131@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> If we are going to go for a beta6, I vote we reverse out the patch. Of
> course, I prefer neither.

I read this several times and am still not quite sure which path you are
voting for. We can:

1. not apply the patch to fix Ross' problem, and ship RC1 tomorrow;
2. apply the patch, and ship RC1 tomorrow;
3. apply the patch and delay RC1.

Which do you like?

Personally I think this is a low-risk patch and so choice 2 is
appropriate.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2002-11-14 20:39:11 Re: Propose RC1 for Friday ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-11-14 20:30:53 Re: Propose RC1 for Friday ...