From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Oleg Lebedev <olebedev(at)waterford(dot)org> |
Cc: | Postgres SQL Mailing List <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: won't drop the view |
Date: | 2001-12-26 22:25:50 |
Message-ID: | 21237.1009405550@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
Oleg Lebedev <olebedev(at)waterford(dot)org> writes:
> yeilds 235 rows, with a total of 240 rows in activity table. I wonder
> why EXPLAIN estimates only 1 row?
Ugh, that's a pretty horrible misestimation. What do you get from
select attname,attdispersion,s.*
from pg_statistic s, pg_attribute a, pg_class c
where starelid = c.oid and attrelid = c.oid and staattnum = attnum
and relname = 'activity';
(you'll need to do "VACUUM ANALYZE activity" first).
> Are there any online docs on how the planner works?
The first two sections of
http://developer.postgresql.org/docs/postgres/performance-tips.html
are a starting point --- but keep in mind that section 11.2 describes
PG 7.2's stats. The pg_statistic scheme in 7.1 is much simpler.
I am hoping that 7.2 will get a better result for this query, but can't
tell without more info.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Oleg Lebedev | 2001-12-27 01:48:32 | Re: won't drop the view |
Previous Message | Oleg Lebedev | 2001-12-26 19:40:01 | Re: won't drop the view |