From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Mikhail Terekhov" <terekhov(at)emc(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Can a windows DLL have more than one process attached? |
Date: | 2001-12-02 15:32:12 |
Message-ID: | 21231.1007307132@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>> Is there some other DLL we could look in instead?
> I can't find a reference to one anywhere - except it's included by
> default in at least Win2k and later (with no extra loading of DLLs)
Well, we're down to the wire on 7.2, and I don't think there will be
any votes to postpone 7.2 release while we resolve this problem ;-).
So what I propose to do is remove the netmsg.dll code for now,
leaving only the FormatMessage(...FORMAT_MESSAGE_FROM_SYSTEM...) call
in winsock_strerror. This is still better than what we had in 7.1.
We can look for a better answer for older Windows flavors to add in
7.3 or later.
Any objections?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeroen T. Vermeulen | 2001-12-02 15:49:14 | LISTEN & transactions |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2001-12-02 14:01:37 | Re: Can a windows DLL have more than one process attached? |