| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> |
| Cc: | "Mikhail Terekhov" <terekhov(at)emc(dot)com>, pgsql-interfaces(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Can a windows DLL have more than one process attached? |
| Date: | 2001-12-02 15:32:12 |
| Message-ID: | 21231.1007307132@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-interfaces |
"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>> Is there some other DLL we could look in instead?
> I can't find a reference to one anywhere - except it's included by
> default in at least Win2k and later (with no extra loading of DLLs)
Well, we're down to the wire on 7.2, and I don't think there will be
any votes to postpone 7.2 release while we resolve this problem ;-).
So what I propose to do is remove the netmsg.dll code for now,
leaving only the FormatMessage(...FORMAT_MESSAGE_FROM_SYSTEM...) call
in winsock_strerror. This is still better than what we had in 7.1.
We can look for a better answer for older Windows flavors to add in
7.3 or later.
Any objections?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeroen T. Vermeulen | 2001-12-02 15:49:14 | LISTEN & transactions |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2001-12-02 14:01:37 | Re: Can a windows DLL have more than one process attached? |