Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net>
Cc: <dave(dot)held(at)arraysg(dot)com>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement
Date: 2005-05-03 00:04:49
Message-ID: 2121.24.211.165.134.1115078689.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers

Robert Treat said:

>> * Engage the community by participating in discussions and patch
>> reviews - your credibility as a contributor depends on your
>> willingness to contribute to the community in non-coding
>> ways as well
>
> Actually I think Bruces blurb is good for the general FAQ, and this
> would be good for the Developer FAQs
>

I nat happy avout that last point - personally, I value most highly the
views of those who contribute code or similar and least highly the views of
those whose principal contribution is opinions.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-05-03 03:03:43 Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement
Previous Message Robert Treat 2005-05-03 00:02:19 Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Neil Conway 2005-05-03 01:02:38 Re: SPI bug.
Previous Message Robert Treat 2005-05-03 00:02:19 Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement