From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
Cc: | <dave(dot)held(at)arraysg(dot)com>, <pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement |
Date: | 2005-05-03 00:04:49 |
Message-ID: | 2121.24.211.165.134.1115078689.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Robert Treat said:
>> * Engage the community by participating in discussions and patch
>> reviews - your credibility as a contributor depends on your
>> willingness to contribute to the community in non-coding
>> ways as well
>
> Actually I think Bruces blurb is good for the general FAQ, and this
> would be good for the Developer FAQs
>
I nat happy avout that last point - personally, I value most highly the
views of those who contribute code or similar and least highly the views of
those whose principal contribution is opinions.
cheers
andrew
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-05-03 03:03:43 | Re: [pgsql-advocacy] Increased company involvement |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2005-05-03 00:02:19 | Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Neil Conway | 2005-05-03 01:02:38 | Re: SPI bug. |
Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2005-05-03 00:02:19 | Re: [HACKERS] Decision Process WAS: Increased company involvement |