Re: Connection Pools and DISCARD ALL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Neil Conway <neilc(at)samurai(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Connection Pools and DISCARD ALL
Date: 2007-10-04 21:08:29
Message-ID: 21198.1191532109@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Could we maybe have some flavor of ROLLBACK that doesn't issue a warning
> if no transaction is in progress? There is precedent for this sort of
> facility - DROP ... IF EXISTS.

Something that would actually be doable for 8.3 would be to downgrade
this particular WARNING to a NOTICE. A DBA who hasn't got
log_min_messages set higher than NOTICE hasn't really got a lot of room
to whine about bulky logs.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2007-10-04 21:33:42 Re: First steps with 8.3 and autovacuum launcher
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-10-04 21:03:36 ecpg build now breaks mingw

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Euler Taveira de Oliveira 2007-10-07 22:47:06 pt_BR FAQ update
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2007-10-04 20:27:06 Re: Connection Pools and DISCARD ALL