Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT
Date: 2014-02-12 21:42:03
Message-ID: 21193.1392241323@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
>>> There are cases where one module needs symbols from another directly.
>>> Would that be affected by this?

> It works reasonably well on other platforms.

> Of course, we can barely build extension modules on Windows, so maybe
> this is a bit much to ask. But as long as we're dealing only with
> functions, not variables, it should work without any dllimport dances,
> right?

AFAIK we've not changed anything that would affect that.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-02-12 21:46:44 Re: [DOCS] Viability of text HISTORY/INSTALL/regression README files (was Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Document a few more regression test hazards.)
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2014-02-12 21:35:56 Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT