Re: Attachments

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Vick Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org>
Cc: John McKown <john(dot)archie(dot)mckown(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Attachments
Date: 2016-02-02 22:19:22
Message-ID: 21187.1454451562@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Vick Khera <vivek(at)khera(dot)org> writes:
> (4) loses historical information when the linked document goes away.

Yeah. Historically we've been very down on bug reports or patch
submissions that do not provide all the requested information right
in the message. This is important for archival reasons. The Postgres
mail archives go back nearly twenty years at this point, and we have
every expectation of still being around in another ten or twenty.
Very few outside URLs are likely to survive that long.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John R Pierce 2016-02-02 22:37:58 Re: Postgres 9.5 - password for new windows user
Previous Message postgresql 2016-02-02 22:10:54 MongoDB FDW Problem.