| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> |
| Cc: | John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>, "'pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org' SQL" <pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: info is a reserved word? |
| Date: | 2006-01-13 04:21:28 |
| Message-ID: | 21184.1137126088@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-sql |
Michael Fuhr <mike(at)fuhr(dot)org> writes:
> 'info' only seems special in PL/pgSQL, presumably because it's one
> of the possible RAISE levels. You should also get an error if you
> try 'exception', 'warning', etc.
plpgsql is not very good about reserving words "minimally", ie, not
treating a word as a keyword outside the context where the keyword
is meaningful.
This could probably be fixed, or at least greatly reduced, with some
flex/bison hacking. Anyone up for it?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | John DeSoi | 2006-01-13 04:34:49 | Re: Contrib Schemas |
| Previous Message | Christopher Kings-Lynne | 2006-01-13 02:03:43 | Re: Contrib Schemas |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2006-01-13 04:57:56 | Re: info is a reserved word? |
| Previous Message | Michael Fuhr | 2006-01-13 01:29:32 | Re: info is a reserved word? |