Re: [GENERAL] missing something obvious about intervals?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>
Cc: Bruno Wolff III <bruno(at)wolff(dot)to>, Jim Buttafuoco <jim(at)contactbda(dot)com>, David Rysdam <drysdam(at)ll(dot)mit(dot)edu>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] missing something obvious about intervals?
Date: 2005-12-13 04:07:58
Message-ID: 2116.1134446878@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general pgsql-hackers

"Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Dec 12, 2005 at 12:34:45PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> You are better off doing a multiply. Something like:
>> area=> select '2005-12-01'::date + 456.5 * '1 second'::interval;
>> ?column?
>> ------------------------
>> 2005-12-01 00:07:36.50
>> (1 row)

> This comes up often enough that it's probably worth adding a built-in
> function,

The only case I've noticed seeing on a regular basis is Unix timestamp
conversion (ie, the special case where the date is 1970-01-01); and we
did add a built-in function for that in 8.1.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-12-13 04:09:01 Re: Excessive vacuum times
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2005-12-13 03:44:01 Re: Excessive vacuum times

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Browne 2005-12-13 04:28:57 Re: Cost-based optimizers
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-12-13 03:39:47 Re: 7.3 failure on platypus