Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query

From: YUriy Zhuravlev <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: clearing opfuncid vs. parallel query
Date: 2015-10-22 17:19:41
Message-ID: 2114858.AupMSLaA2Q@dinodell
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thursday 22 October 2015 12:53:49 you wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 12:15 PM, YUriy Zhuravlev
>
> <u(dot)zhuravlev(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> wrote:
> > Hello.
> > Currently using nodeToString and stringToNode you can not pass a full
> > plan. In this regard, what is the plan to fix it? Or in the under task
> > parallel query does not have such a problem?
>
> It's already fixed. See commits
> a0d9f6e434bb56f7e5441b7988f3982feead33b3 and
> 9f1255ac859364a86264a67729dbd1a36dd63ff2.

Ahh. Thanks.

And then another question:
What do you think if the generated equalfuncs.c, copyfuncs.c, readfuncs.c,
outfuncs.c from XML or JSON?
In order not to change the code in four places when changing nodes.

--
YUriy Zhuravlev
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
The Russian Postgres Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-10-22 17:24:32 make Gather node projection-capable
Previous Message Masahiko Sawada 2015-10-22 17:10:11 Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.