From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: point -> double,double ? |
Date: | 2003-01-18 04:02:55 |
Message-ID: | 21148.1042862575@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:
> Hm, this seems odd
> slo=> select b,b[0],b[0][0] from t;
> b | b | b
> -----------------------------------------------+------------------------+---
> (-75.493906,44.854114),(-75.493906,44.854114) | (-75.493906,44.854114) |
> (1 row)
The problem here is that foo[m][n] is our notation for a
doubly-subscripted array --- and we don't have any concept in the type
system that a one-dimensional array is different from a two-dimensional
array. So the code goes down the primrose path of assuming that "b"
is a 2-D array of points, rather than expecting b[0] to yield a
separate datatype that should be separately subscripted.
We could perhaps hack something for this particular case, since box is
known not to be a general array but only a hardwired one-dimensional
array of points. I don't see a good general solution though.
Any thoughts?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Stark | 2003-01-18 08:01:05 | Re: point -> double,double ? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2003-01-18 03:43:07 | Re: Fw: configure error with krb5 |