Re: reloptions with a "namespace"

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Khee Chin <kheechin(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: reloptions with a "namespace"
Date: 2009-04-03 20:01:32
Message-ID: 21098.1238788892@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> This patch seems to be the right cure. (Some other users of
> opt_definition remain; I think it's just CREATE FUNCTION by now).

Surely this will break other things. I find myself wondering why you
invented ReloptElem at all, instead of adding a field to DefElem.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2009-04-03 20:06:47 Re: reloptions with a "namespace"
Previous Message Tom Lane 2009-04-03 19:46:06 Re: GetCurrentVirtualXIDs()