Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication

From: Joshua Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
To: Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Strange issues with 9.2 pg_basebackup & replication
Date: 2012-05-17 03:01:48
Message-ID: 2109181580.290842.1337223708416.JavaMail.root@mail-1.01.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers


> > And: if we still have to ship logs, what's the point in even having
> > cascading replication?
>
> At least cascading replication (1) allows you to adopt more flexible
> configuration of servers,

I'm just pretty shocked. The last time we talked about this, at the end of the 9.1 development cycle, you almost had remastering using streaming-only replication working, you just ran out of time. Now it appears that you've abandoned working on that completely. What's going on?

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joshua Berkus 2012-05-17 03:08:23 Why is indexonlyscan so darned slow?
Previous Message Robert Haas 2012-05-17 02:58:13 Re: transformations between types and languages