From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(at)vondra(dot)me>, Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: scalability bottlenecks with (many) partitions (and more) |
Date: | 2025-03-05 00:16:33 |
Message-ID: | 210865.1741133793@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 2025-03-04 Tu 5:28 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> ... I eventually concluded that there's
>> something wrong with the "scalar glob()" idiom you used.
> Well, in scalar context it should give us back the first item found, or
> undef if nothing is found, AIUI.
That's what I would have thought too, but it didn't seem to work that
way when I was testing the logic standalone: the script processed or
skipped directories according to no rule that I could figure out.
Anyway, for the moment I think we're all right with just the
directory path fix.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andreas Karlsson | 2025-03-05 00:24:40 | Re: Next commitfest app release is planned for March 18th |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2025-03-05 00:13:19 | Re: scalability bottlenecks with (many) partitions (and more) |