| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Tara Piorkowski <tara(at)vilaj(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, awitney(at)sghms(dot)ac(dot)uk |
| Subject: | Re: Request for supported platforms |
| Date: | 2002-10-29 13:50:46 |
| Message-ID: | 21085.1035899446@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Strange. I just got report from another OSX 10.2.1 user saying
> regression tests passed:
> 10.2.1, Adam Witney (awitney(at)sghms(dot)ac(dot)uk>
> The proper value seems to be:
> 15.3864610140472
> or
> 15.3864610140473
> in ./expected/geometry-powerpc-darwin.out. Which is it, folks?
The existing geometry file is exactly correct on my laptop (Powerbook
G3 using OSX 10.1). I am not sure whether the differences some users
have reported are due to hardware or OS version differences. We need
to figure that out and refine the resultmap, not just change the
existing file.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Adam Witney | 2002-10-29 13:55:41 | Re: Request for supported platforms |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-10-29 13:37:29 | Re: pg_dump and large files - is this a problem? |