Re: Status of plperl inter-sp calling

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Status of plperl inter-sp calling
Date: 2010-01-06 00:06:35
Message-ID: 21079.1262736395@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tim Bunce <Tim(dot)Bunce(at)pobox(dot)com> writes:
> The only question I have at the moment, before I try implementing this,
> is the the need for freeing the plan. When would that be needed?

There's probably no strong need to do it at all, unless you are dropping
your last reference to the plan.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Scott Bailey 2010-01-06 00:34:46 Re: xpath improvement suggestion
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-01-05 23:54:36 Re: Status of plperl inter-sp calling