From: | Jan de Visser <jan(at)de-visser(dot)net> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi |
Cc: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Improve sleep processing of pg_rewind TAP tests |
Date: | 2015-04-22 17:43:26 |
Message-ID: | 2106017.R4ks7JVoQy@wolverine |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On April 22, 2015 11:14:08 AM Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
> On 04/16/2015 06:51 AM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> > Seems reasonable, but why are you sleeping 1s if pg_ctl -w is in use? I
> > thought the -w would wait until promotion has taken effect, so there's
> > no need to sleep additional time.
>
> -w is not supported with pg_ctl promote. Only start, stop and restart.
> It's accepted, but it doesn't do anything. Which isn't very nice...
I'm futzing with the pg_ctl cmd line parameters for my patch notifying pg_ctl
that restart didn't work. I'll fix this as well.
>
> - Heikki
jan
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2015-04-22 17:59:35 | Re: Turning off HOT/Cleanup sometimes |
Previous Message | Dean Rasheed | 2015-04-22 17:12:19 | Re: Row security violation error is misleading |