Re: Trailing comma support in SELECT statements

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com>
Cc: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)justatheory(dot)com>, Alex Goncharov <alex(dot)goncharov(dot)usa(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, David Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Trailing comma support in SELECT statements
Date: 2014-10-28 23:30:38
Message-ID: 21053.1414539038@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)BlueTreble(dot)com> writes:
> On 10/28/14, 4:25 PM, David E. Wheeler wrote:
>> This one, however, is more a judgment of people and their practices rather than the feature itself. Color me unimpressed.

> +1.

> Having users sweat of comma placement in this day and age is pretty stupid. I can understand why we wouldn't want to break backwards compatibility, but I think it does us and our users a disservice to dismiss the issue.

I don't think anyone is just dismissing the issue. But it is certainly a
judgment call as to whether the pros outweigh the cons, and I'm not seeing
a clear majority of us thinking they do.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David Johnston 2014-10-28 23:59:58 Re: Trailing comma support in SELECT statements
Previous Message Robert Haas 2014-10-28 23:27:53 Re: group locking: incomplete patch, just for discussion