Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kurt Harriman <harriman(at)acm(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions
Date: 2010-02-13 02:35:29
Message-ID: 21052.1266028529@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, Feb 10, 2010 at 5:53 PM, Kurt Harriman <harriman(at)acm(dot)org> wrote:
>> Revised patch is attached (4th edition).

> This looks generally sane to me, though it seems entirely imaginable
> that it might break something, somewhere, for somebody... in which
> case I suppose we'll adjust as needed.

Looks sane to me too -- committed. We'll soon see what the buildfarm
thinks (though the number of non-gcc buildfarm members is depressingly
small).

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2010-02-13 02:36:44 Re: Patch: Remove gcc dependency in definition of inline functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-02-13 02:31:56 Re: Writeable CTEs and empty relations