Re: doc review for v14

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: doc review for v14
Date: 2020-12-29 14:36:21
Message-ID: 2103992.1609252581@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
> On Tue, Dec 29, 2020 at 1:37 AM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
>> Magnus, do I have an access to that? This is the second time I am
>> crossing an issue with this issue, but I don't really know if I should
>> act on it or not :)

> No, at this point it's just Tom (who has all the commits) and me (who set
> it up, and now has one commit). It's all manually handled.

FTR, I have no objection to Michael (or any other PG committer) having
write access to that repo. I think so far it's a matter of nobody's
bothered because there's so little need.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message 陈佳昕 (步真) 2020-12-29 15:13:12 回复:Re: Re: Cache relation sizes?
Previous Message Noah Misch 2020-12-29 13:49:24 Dump public schema ownership & seclabels