Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: ITAGAKI Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)oss(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: contrib/pg_stat_statements
Date: 2008-11-14 21:01:42
Message-ID: 21029.1226696502@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Martin Pihlak <martin(dot)pihlak(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> ITAGAKI Takahiro wrote:
>>> But is the idea of extending QueryDesc generally acceptable? Is it OK
>>> to make a copy of the query string?
>>
>> The only thing I'm worried about is that QueryDesc lives longer than
>> its queryText. Can I assume it never occurs?

> I just finished validating this -- it seems OK. All of the query strings
> that make it to CreateQueryDesc are either pstrdup-ed to Portal, in long
> lived memory context or just literals. So no need to make extra copies :)

I'm trying to figure out what is the status of this patch? I'm not sure
if there's any point in applying it, when contrib/pg_stat_statements
hasn't been updated to make use of it.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Smith 2008-11-14 21:07:00 Re: Simple postgresql.conf wizard
Previous Message Tom Lane 2008-11-14 20:55:41 Re: auto_explain contrib moudle