Thomas Hallgren <thhal(at)mailblocks(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> This isn't really open for debate, because if we don't put that there,
>> pg_indent will go nuts.
>>
> I'm not familiar with pg_indent but my guess is that the first and
> foremost motivation for its existence is code readability and consistent
> style? It must be simple to make it recognize and handle the new macros.
Perhaps, but what about everyone's editors' autoindent logic?
I'd have preferred not to have the "();" decoration too, but it is
really not worth the pain.
regards, tom lane