Re: Pgfoundry and gborg: shut one down

From: "Jeroen T(dot) Vermeulen" <jtv(at)xs4all(dot)nl>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Thomas Hallgren" <thomas(at)tada(dot)se>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Pgfoundry and gborg: shut one down
Date: 2006-02-20 03:45:34
Message-ID: 21026.125.24.8.84.1140407134.squirrel@webmail.xs4all.nl
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, February 19, 2006 05:10, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> I don't care what direction we go, just kill one.

Speaking for libpqxx, my only concern with that is the mailing list.
Would those have to move to different addresses--or conversely, would a
forced migration make it much easier to move *all* GBorg mailing lists to
pgFoundry and maintain their old addresses?

Jeroen

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message elein 2006-02-20 03:48:31 Re: Domains and supporting functions
Previous Message Albert Chin 2006-02-20 03:02:55 Re: AC_REPLACE_FUNCS([getaddrinfo]) in 8.1.3