| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles |
| Date: | 2005-07-01 20:17:49 |
| Message-ID: | 21025.1120249069@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Robert Treat <xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net> writes:
> Was following this conversation up till now, because these two statement seem
> to contradict each other. Do we really support groups still, are is CREATE
> GROUP now syntactical sugar for some for of CREATE ROLE.
CREATE GROUP and CREATE USER are both now syntactic sugar for CREATE
ROLE.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2005-07-01 20:20:20 | Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2005-07-01 20:07:29 | Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Stephen Frost | 2005-07-01 20:20:20 | Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles |
| Previous Message | Robert Treat | 2005-07-01 20:07:29 | Re: [PATCHES] Users/Groups -> Roles |