Re: Is there a peer-to-peer server solution with PG?

From: Pailloncy Jean-Gerard <jg(at)rilk(dot)com>
To: Postgres list general mailing <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Is there a peer-to-peer server solution with PG?
Date: 2005-02-07 14:10:17
Message-ID: 20e97a961cf844622c1a3465244e3728@rilk.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

> You do realize that any multimaster replication system, that is
> designed to avoind complex business process structure based conflict
> resolution mechanisms, necessarily has to be based on 2 phase commit
> or similar? So your global write transaction throughput will be
> limited by the latency of your WAN, no matter what bandwidth you have.
> And as per RFC 1925: No matter how hard you push and no matter what
> the priority, you can't increase the speed of light.
>
> I think what you are really looking for is an application internal
> abstraction layer based multmaster replication approach.
Hi,

I found a paper about Clustra DB
http://www.nuug.no/pub/dist/20011017-clustra.pdf

Clustra is a cluster database for high-availability, any node has one
other fail-over node designed. But the interesting idea is that the
data is distributed across the node.
A transaction implies many nodes, but is managed by a two phase commit
and the log is written on ONLY few (two) nodes.
I suppose (because I never used it) that there is a speed boost.

Cordialement,
Jean-Gérard Pailloncy

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Konference 2005-02-07 14:10:58 PostgreSQL, exception and PHP
Previous Message Sandeep Gaikwad 2005-02-07 14:04:15 Re: Problem performing a restore of a data schema in Windows