From: | Pailloncy Jean-Gerard <jg(at)rilk(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Postgres list general mailing <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Cc: | Jan Wieck <JanWieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com> |
Subject: | Re: Is there a peer-to-peer server solution with PG? |
Date: | 2005-02-07 14:10:17 |
Message-ID: | 20e97a961cf844622c1a3465244e3728@rilk.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> You do realize that any multimaster replication system, that is
> designed to avoind complex business process structure based conflict
> resolution mechanisms, necessarily has to be based on 2 phase commit
> or similar? So your global write transaction throughput will be
> limited by the latency of your WAN, no matter what bandwidth you have.
> And as per RFC 1925: No matter how hard you push and no matter what
> the priority, you can't increase the speed of light.
>
> I think what you are really looking for is an application internal
> abstraction layer based multmaster replication approach.
Hi,
I found a paper about Clustra DB
http://www.nuug.no/pub/dist/20011017-clustra.pdf
Clustra is a cluster database for high-availability, any node has one
other fail-over node designed. But the interesting idea is that the
data is distributed across the node.
A transaction implies many nodes, but is managed by a two phase commit
and the log is written on ONLY few (two) nodes.
I suppose (because I never used it) that there is a speed boost.
Cordialement,
Jean-Gérard Pailloncy
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Konference | 2005-02-07 14:10:58 | PostgreSQL, exception and PHP |
Previous Message | Sandeep Gaikwad | 2005-02-07 14:04:15 | Re: Problem performing a restore of a data schema in Windows |