Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 21 September 2015 at 16:09, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> After trying to rework the comment to explain what maxdig really meant
>> after your changes, I came to the conclusion that it'd be better to do
>> it as per attached. Does this look sane to you?
> Yes that looks better. It's still the same amount of extra headroom
> (21), but I think it's clearer your way.
OK, pushed (after further hacking on the comment ...)
regards, tom lane