| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Hiroshi Inoue <inoue(at)tpf(dot)co(dot)jp>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: narwhal and PGDLLIMPORT |
| Date: | 2014-02-12 21:35:06 |
| Message-ID: | 20975.1392240906@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> writes:
> On February 12, 2014 10:23:21 PM CET, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>> There are cases where one module needs symbols from another directly.
>> Would that be affected by this?
> I don't think we have real infrastructure for that yet. Neither from the POV of loading several .so's, nor from a symbol visibility. Afaics we'd need a working definition of PGDLLIMPORT which inverts the declspecs. I think Tom just removed the remnants of that.
No, I've not touched the PGDLLIMPORT macros. I was hoping to, but it
looks like we're not getting there :-(
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2014-02-12 21:35:40 | Re: memory usage of pg_upgrade |
| Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2014-02-12 21:34:47 | Re: Terminating pg_basebackup background streamer |