Re: Success: Finished porting application to postgreSQL

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Ralph Graulich <maillist(at)shauny(dot)de>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Success: Finished porting application to postgreSQL
Date: 2002-08-19 01:42:17
Message-ID: 20961.1029721337@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Ralph Graulich <maillist(at)shauny(dot)de> writes:
> after several weeks I have finished porting my application to postgreSQL,
> which formerly ran on mySQL. ...

> Nonetheless a very positive side effect of porting, the server load
> dropped from an average of about 15 (fifteen) to below 1, most of the time
> even below 0.5 on average and the application sped up about ten times - I
> can judge this, cause I am running performance logs.

Cool. We keep hearing about how MySQL is faster than Postgres, so it's
always nice to see hard evidence that it ain't necessarily so. Do you
have any thoughts about where the speedup came from --- for example,
were you able to rewrite queries into more efficient forms using PG's
extra features?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Joe Conway 2002-08-19 01:53:26 Re: bytea operator bugs (was Re: [GENERAL] BYTEA, indexes
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-08-19 01:05:51 Re: refcursor and number of records