Re: Why lower's not accept an AS declaration ?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com>
Cc: Hervé Piedvache <herve(at)elma(dot)fr>, Darko Prenosil <darko(dot)prenosil(at)finteh(dot)hr>, Postgresql General <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Why lower's not accept an AS declaration ?
Date: 2003-08-19 06:10:11
Message-ID: 20931.1061273411@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Stephan Szabo <sszabo(at)megazone(dot)bigpanda(dot)com> writes:
> Yeah. These rules don't seem to make much sense, why bother making
> it a general value expression if you're going to limit it like that?
> It almost makes me wonder what SQL200x is going to do to the clause.

Maybe it's a typo ... could someone check the SQL200x wording?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Juris Krumins 2003-08-19 07:26:14 Temporary tables
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-08-19 06:07:51 Re: array concat, et al patch