From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> |
Cc: | pgsql-sql(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [SQL] More efficient DELETE ... ? |
Date: | 2000-01-22 18:07:47 |
Message-ID: | 20925.948564467@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-sql |
The Hermit Hacker <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org> writes:
> This looks painful ...
> DELETE FROM webhit_referer_raw
> WHERE oid IN ( SELECT w.oid
> FROM webhit_referer_raw w, referrer_data r
> WHERE stat_date < 'Jan 17 2000 15:05:00'
> AND w.referrer_url = r.referrer );
I believe you can do
DELETE FROM webhit_referer_raw
WHERE referrer_url = referrer_data.referrer
AND referrer_data.stat_date < 'Jan 17 2000 15:05:00';
(I assume stat_date is in referrer_data, otherwise this'd be easy.)
This is an example where Postgres' willingness to create implicit FROM
clause entries is a win ... AFAIK you couldn't do it in standard SQL,
since for some reason DELETE doesn't take a FROM clause.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Web Manager | 2000-01-22 18:28:10 | Repost: restore from dump problem - query buffer full |
Previous Message | Mark Stosberg | 2000-01-22 18:06:39 | geo_distance radius question |