Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RfD: more powerful "any" types
Date: 2009-09-11 15:29:22
Message-ID: 20897.1252682962@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I like the idea of making concatenation more pretty, quite frankly.
> No one has really responded to Pavel's contention that this is what
> to_char() is for.

[ shrug... ] I regard this as a prettier replacement for to_char.
That thing has got nothing whatsoever to recommend it, other than being
bug-compatible with Oracle.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Pierre Frédéric Caillaud 2009-09-11 15:32:40 Re: COPY enhancements
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-09-11 15:29:17 Re: Ragged CSV import