Re: Patch application

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Patch application
Date: 2001-03-19 19:42:55
Message-ID: 20892.985030975@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc pgsql-odbc

Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I think it is time to start giving people official responsibility for
> certain areas of the code.

This strikes me as overly formalistic, and more likely to lead to
arteriosclerosis than any improvement in code quality. Particularly
with a breakdown such as you have proposed, which would likely mean
asking multiple people to approve any given patch.

I think the procedural error in this past weekend's contrib mess was
simply that you didn't pay attention to the fact that Oleg's patch was
based on an out-of-date copy of the contrib module. You should have
either merged the changes or bounced it back to Oleg for him to do so.

Insisting on CVS $Header$ or $Id$ markers in all code files might help
to detect this kind of error --- but nothing will help if you are
willing to overwrite other people's changes simply because you didn't
recall the reason for them at the moment.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alfred Perlstein 2001-03-19 19:44:02 Re: ODBC/FreeBSD/LinuxEmulation/RPM?
Previous Message Alfred Perlstein 2001-03-19 19:13:23 Re: ODBC/FreeBSD/LinuxEmulation/RPM?

Browse pgsql-jdbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-03-19 19:50:56 Re: Patch application
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-19 16:34:03 Patch application

Browse pgsql-odbc by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message The Hermit Hacker 2001-03-19 19:50:56 Re: Patch application
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-03-19 16:34:03 Patch application