Re: pgsql: Add TAP test to automate the equivalent of check_guc

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com>
Cc: Christoph Berg <myon(at)debian(dot)org>, Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz>, pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: pgsql: Add TAP test to automate the equivalent of check_guc
Date: 2022-02-11 17:34:31
Message-ID: 2079693.1644600871@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers

Justin Pryzby <pryzby(at)telsasoft(dot)com> writes:
> Or, is it okay to use ABS_SRCDIR?

Don't see why not --- other tests certainly do.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2022-02-11 19:58:57 pgsql: Replace Test::More plans with done_testing
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2022-02-11 17:29:29 Re: pgsql: Add TAP test to automate the equivalent of check_guc

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-02-11 17:35:50 Re: [Proposal] Fully WAL logged CREATE DATABASE - No Checkpoints
Previous Message Justin Pryzby 2022-02-11 17:29:29 Re: pgsql: Add TAP test to automate the equivalent of check_guc