Re: minor windows & cygwin regression failures on stable branch

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: minor windows & cygwin regression failures on stable branch
Date: 2005-03-27 21:45:22
Message-ID: 20789.1111959922@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> What has changed in the last 3 weeks is that I refreshed my Cygwin
> installation, I think when I was wrestling with the NLS thing. If
> nothing in postgres has changed in this area I assume that platform
> changes account for the regression.

Sounds that way to me too, but it's disturbing. One would say they
broke their scheduler :-(. Possibly you should try to stir up some
interest among the Cygwin hackers in looking into this.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Karel Zak 2005-03-27 22:14:15 Re: Bug 1500
Previous Message Oleg Bartunov 2005-03-27 21:33:58 postgreSQL and history of relational databases