From: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Vik Fearing <vik(at)postgresfriends(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Allow CURRENT_ROLE in GRANTED BY |
Date: | 2020-12-10 18:39:49 |
Message-ID: | 2073b6a9-7f79-5a00-5f26-cd19589a52c7@2ndquadrant.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On 2020-06-24 20:21, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> On 2020-06-24 10:12, Vik Fearing wrote:
>> On 6/24/20 8:35 AM, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>>> I was checking some loose ends in SQL conformance, when I noticed: We
>>> support GRANT role ... GRANTED BY CURRENT_USER, but we don't support
>>> CURRENT_ROLE in that place, even though in PostgreSQL they are
>>> equivalent. Here is a trivial patch to add that.
>>
>>
>> The only thing that isn't dead-obvious about this patch is the commit
>> message says "[PATCH 1/2]". What is in the other part?
>
> Hehe. The second patch is some in-progress work to add the GRANTED BY
> clause to the regular GRANT command. More on that perhaps at a later date.
Here is the highly anticipated and quite underwhelming second part of
this patch set.
--
Peter Eisentraut
2ndQuadrant, an EDB company
https://www.2ndquadrant.com/
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
0001-Allow-GRANTED-BY-clause-in-normal-GRANT-and-REVOKE-s.patch | text/plain | 16.2 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2020-12-10 18:42:36 | Re: Proposed patch for key managment |
Previous Message | Pavel Stehule | 2020-12-10 18:09:07 | Re: On login trigger: take three |