Re: Regression test failure date.

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Creager <Robert_Creager(at)LogicalChaos(dot)org>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>
Subject: Re: Regression test failure date.
Date: 2003-07-27 00:24:56
Message-ID: 20737.1059265496@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Robert Creager <Robert_Creager(at)LogicalChaos(dot)org> writes:
> 2003-02-15 passes 50/50 and 33/33 on second pass (so far)
> 2003-02-16 fails 6/50

I looked in the CVS logs while waiting for a compile, and the only patch
I see that goes anywhere near the locking or cache code around that time
is this one:

2003-02-17 21:13 momjian

* src/: backend/storage/lmgr/deadlock.c,
backend/storage/lmgr/lock.c, backend/storage/lmgr/proc.c,
backend/utils/adt/lockfuncs.c, include/storage/lock.h,
include/storage/proc.h: Rename 'holder' references to 'proclock'
for PROCLOCK references, for consistency.

which seems like a safe change (I assume it was just a
search-and-replace; do you recall, Bruce?) and anyway the time is not
quite right.

What time of day did your successive pulls correspond to, anyway?
(I believe my cvs2cl printout above is showing me EST.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2003-07-27 00:55:09 Re: Regression test failure date.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2003-07-27 00:14:45 Re: Regression test failure date.