Re: Bad rules

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Steve King <steve(dot)king(at)ecmsys(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Bad rules
Date: 2002-10-04 14:48:10
Message-ID: 20734.1033742890@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Steve King <steve(dot)king(at)ecmsys(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> I am using postgres 7.2, and have rule on a table which causes a notify if
> an insert/update/delete is performed on the table.
> The table is very very small.
> When performing a simple (very simple) update on the table this takes about
> 3 secs, when I remove the rule it is virtually instantaneous.
> The rest of the database seems to perform fine, have you any ideas or come
> across this before??

Let's see the rule exactly? NOTIFY per se is not slow in my experience.

(One thing to ask: have you done a VACUUM FULL on pg_listener in recent
memory? Heavy use of LISTEN/NOTIFY does tend to bloat that table if you
don't keep after it with VACUUM.)

regards, tom lane

In response to

  • Bad rules at 2002-09-30 08:14:00 from Steve King

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Manfred Koizar 2002-10-04 15:13:32 Re: Correlation in cost_index()
Previous Message Hans-Jürgen Schönig 2002-10-04 14:40:37 Re: Threaded Sorting