| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Reorganization of the translation files |
| Date: | 2004-11-09 17:00:46 |
| Message-ID: | 20725.1100019646@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> I was thinking about organizing the translation files in a more efficient
> manner. (not for 8.0, obviously)
> [snip]
> And it would easily solve issues like translatable strings
> appearing in the pgport library, which has no makefile structure to support
> translations (which would be a waste for like 5 strings), and no run-time
> support either.
Sounds like a win to me on that grounds alone; but probably the
translators need to have the biggest say here, since they'll be affected
the most.
One question is whether the gettext code is markedly less efficient when
accessing a large .mo file than a small one; if so, the consolidation
would probably hurt client performance.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2004-11-09 17:10:15 | Re: debugging PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Oliver Elphick | 2004-11-09 16:54:59 | Re: server auto-restarts and ipcs |