From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: GET DIAGNOSTICS (was Re: Open 7.1 items) |
Date: | 2001-02-19 01:40:10 |
Message-ID: | 20723.982546810@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:
>> Hmm, that's definitely what SQL99 uses for the syntax. I wonder where
>> Jan got the SELECT INTO syntax --- did he borrow it from Oracle?
> Sadly, we made it up.
Ah so. Well, friendliness aside, I'd go with the spec's syntax.
> We *do* need to support ROW_COUNT, but allowing
> GET DIAGNOSTICS Select ROW_COUNT, SQLCODE, OID Into :a,:b:,:c;
> is a lot friendlier than the standard:
> GET DIAGNOSTICS :a = ROW_COUNT;
> GET DIAGNOSTICS EXCEPTION 1 :b = SQLCODE;
> GET DIAGNOSTICS :c = OID;
It looks to me like SQL99 allows
GET DIAGNOSTICS :a = ROW_COUNT, :b = OID, ...;
which is at least as good as the SELECT syntax, if not better since each
target variable and info spec are kept together.
> P.S. Is Jan around? He's been very quiet recently...
He's still engaged in moving from Germany to Norfolk, VA. I think his
net-access is somewhat erratic :-(
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tatsuo Ishii | 2001-02-19 01:44:43 | Re: [SQL] PL/SQL-to-PL/PgSQL-HOWTO beta Available |
Previous Message | Philip Warner | 2001-02-19 01:33:26 | Re: GET DIAGNOSTICS (was Re: Open 7.1 items) |