| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |
| Date: | 2018-08-15 19:57:43 |
| Message-ID: | 2069.1534363063@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-www |
David Steele <david(at)pgmasters(dot)net> writes:
> On 8/15/18 3:18 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>> I do dearly miss the ability to easily limit the scope of a loop's
>> control variable to just the loop, eg
>> for (int i = 0; ...) { ... }
>> But AFAIK that's C++ not C99.
> This works in C99 -- and I'm a really big fan.
It does? [ checks standard... ] Oh wow:
6.8.5 Iteration statements
Syntax
iteration-statement:
while ( expression ) statement
do statement while ( expression ) ;
for ( expr-opt ; expr-opt ; expr-opt ) statement
for ( declaration ; expr-opt ; expr-opt ) statement
I'd always thought this was only in C++. This alone might be a sufficient
reason to drop C89 compiler support ...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Sand Stone | 2018-08-15 20:32:45 | Re: dsa_allocate() faliure |
| Previous Message | David Steele | 2018-08-15 19:37:51 | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Andres Freund | 2018-08-15 21:49:31 | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |
| Previous Message | David Steele | 2018-08-15 19:37:51 | Re: C99 compliance for src/port/snprintf.c |