Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "J(dot) R(dot) Nield" <jrnield(at)usol(dot)com>
Cc: Richard Tucker <richt(at)multera(dot)com>, Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hacker <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations
Date: 2002-08-02 21:25:28
Message-ID: 20683.1028323528@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

"J. R. Nield" <jrnield(at)usol(dot)com> writes:
>> (In particular, I *strongly* object to using the buffer manager at all
>> for reading files for backup. That's pretty much guaranteed to blow out
>> buffer cache. Use plain OS-level file reads. An OS directory search
>> will do fine for finding what you need to read, too.)

> How do you get atomic block copies otherwise?

Eh? The kernel does that for you, as long as you're reading the
same-size blocks that the backends are writing, no?

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-08-02 21:29:09 Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations
Previous Message Richard Tucker 2002-08-02 21:20:25 Re: PITR, checkpoint, and local relations