Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Aizaz Ahmed <aahmed(at)redhat(dot)com>
Cc: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Joe Conway <mail(at)joeconway(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org, Fernando Nasser <fnasser(at)redhat(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables
Date: 2003-07-28 19:32:56
Message-ID: 20672.1059420776@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

Aizaz Ahmed <aahmed(at)redhat(dot)com> writes:
>> Good idea. Please send a patch that exports the guc.c array for use in
>> the other file. I'd lean towards the lower-cased spellings, though I'm
>> not strong about it. (I'd also not use a dash in "super-user".)

> I've attached the patch below. It modifies help_config.c to use the new
> GucContextName array from guc.c

Applied, thanks. I also did some other cleanup, including sticking the
enum constant names into the array declarations --- this is in service
of the notion that grepping for the constants should help you find
places you need to change when adding one.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2003-07-28 19:38:10 Re: Doubt w.r.t vacuum
Previous Message Robert Treat 2003-07-28 19:29:27 Re: Doubt w.r.t vacuum

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andreas Pflug 2003-07-28 21:46:45 Re: ruleutils with pretty-print option
Previous Message Aizaz Ahmed 2003-07-28 18:22:06 Re: [HACKERS] allowed user/db variables