From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: COPY with no WAL, in certain circumstances |
Date: | 2007-01-07 02:20:53 |
Message-ID: | 2067.1168136453@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> Simon Riggs wrote:
>> Reason for no documentation was that CREATE INDEX and CREATE TABLE AS
>> SELECT already use this optimisation, but to my knowledge neither was/is
>> documented on those command pages.
> I wasn't aware those used the optimization. Seems they all should be
> documented somewhere.
We don't document every single optimization in the system ... if we did,
the docs would be as big as the source code and equally unreadable by
non-programmers. I think it's a much better idea just to mention it one
place and not try to enumerate exactly which commands have the optimization.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-07 02:27:55 | Re: pg_ctl options |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-07 02:18:02 | Re: COPY with no WAL, in certain circumstances |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-07 02:32:43 | Re: COPY with no WAL, in certain circumstances |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-07 02:18:02 | Re: COPY with no WAL, in certain circumstances |