From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
Cc: | Mark Woodward <pgsql(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, "Jim C(dot) Nasby" <jnasby(at)pervasive(dot)com>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, John DeSoi <desoi(at)pgedit(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [OT] MySQL is bad, but THIS bad? |
Date: | 2006-05-18 20:36:31 |
Message-ID: | 20663.1147984591@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> Mark Woodward wrote:
>> Again, there is so much code for MySQL, a MySQL emulation layer, MEL for
>> short, could allow plug and play compatibility for open source, and closed
>> source, applications that otherwise would force a PostgreSQL user to hold
>> his or her nose and use MySQL.
>>
> If we had infinite resources this might make sense. We don't, so it
> doesn't. There is a real cost to producing a compatibility layer, and
> the cost will be those spiffy new features.
The real problem is that there's a whole lot of stuff, such as mysql's
weak error checking, that I don't think a "compatibility layer" could
sanely provide.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | elein | 2006-05-18 20:46:23 | Re: Toward A Positive Marketing Approach. |
Previous Message | Michael Dean | 2006-05-18 20:32:51 | Toward A Positive Marketing Approach. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | elein | 2006-05-18 20:46:23 | Re: Toward A Positive Marketing Approach. |
Previous Message | Michael Dean | 2006-05-18 20:32:51 | Toward A Positive Marketing Approach. |