Re: 8.2 features status

From: andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net
To: "Gregory Stark" <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "David Fetter" <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, "Bruce Momjian" <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "PostgreSQL-development" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: 8.2 features status
Date: 2006-08-05 00:22:00
Message-ID: 2065.24.211.165.134.1154737320.squirrel@www.dunslane.net
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>
> "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>
>> Those responsibilities include better communication, feature tracking
>> and
>> milestones...
>
> Wow, if we had all those we could have as efficient a release-engineering
> process as Mozilla!
>
>

This is not really a good argument. Might it not be possible that there is
a sweeter spot somewhere in the middle? I don't think anyone wants
something very heavy handed.

cheers

andrew

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Josh Berkus 2006-08-05 00:27:03 Re: 8.2 features status
Previous Message Gregory Stark 2006-08-05 00:07:18 Re: 8.2 features status