From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | David Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: BUG #12273: CASE Expression BUG |
Date: | 2014-12-18 20:10:05 |
Message-ID: | 2065.1418933405@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
David Johnston <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 10:14 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Hmm ... I'd just been looking at 4.2.14:
>> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/static/sql-expressions.html#SYNTAX-EXPRESS-EVAL
>> and thinking that maybe it should mention this. Perhaps we ought to
>> relocate the text about constant subexpressions into 4.2.14 (and add an
>> example), and then link there from 9.17.1.
> +1
> Something like:
> Before "A limitation of this technique [...]"
> The are two limitations to this technique: planner optimizations may occur
> and aggregate expressions will be evaluated.
Yeah, I've just been working on some text to put there. I'm still
wordsmithing it, but right now it's as attached.
> The question is how detailed do we need to get here...is it an issue
> specific to casting or is there some other interplay happening?
It's not particularly specific to casting, any constant subexpression that
could throw errors is at risk. I'm using divide-by-zero as the canonical
example in this area.
regards, tom lane
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
case-docs-fix.patch | text/x-diff | 3.5 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | greg.davidson | 2014-12-18 20:24:23 | BUG #12275: configure incorrectly tests libxml2 version |
Previous Message | David Johnston | 2014-12-18 19:40:26 | Re: BUG #12273: CASE Expression BUG |