"tgarnett(at)panjiva(dot)com" <tgarnett(at)panjiva(dot)com> wrote:
> - why didn't vacuum_db -a -F free up more members files?
Are you sure that while the problem was developing the primary
cluster didn't have any long-running transactions (including those
left "idle in transaction" or prepared transactions)? Was there a
checkpoint following the vacuumdb -a -F run?
--
Kevin Grittner
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company