Re: BUG #2168: 45.000.000 records too much?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Steven Mooij" <steven(at)mooij(dot)name>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #2168: 45.000.000 records too much?
Date: 2006-01-14 17:57:36
Message-ID: 20606.1137261456@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

"Steven Mooij" <steven(at)mooij(dot)name> writes:
> testsearch=> insert into t_documentword2 (SELECT document_id, t_word2.id,
> frequency from t_documentword, t_word2 where t_documentword.word =
> t_word2.word);
> server closed the connection unexpectedly

There's not enough information here to guess what the problem is.
(But it's not table size; people routinely manipulate tables much
bigger than that in Postgres.) A stack trace from the core dump
would be really helpful, or even better a self-contained test case
that other people could replicate the failure with. See the bug
reporting guidelines at
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/bug-reporting.html

> I got the same result in version 7.5.15.

There is no version of Postgres named 7.5.anything.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Lee Thompson 2006-01-14 21:23:58 BUG #2170: --rpath option is skipping shared libs
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-01-14 17:28:06 Re: BUG #2000: psql does not prompt for password