From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | "Steven Mooij" <steven(at)mooij(dot)name> |
Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: BUG #2168: 45.000.000 records too much? |
Date: | 2006-01-14 17:57:36 |
Message-ID: | 20606.1137261456@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
"Steven Mooij" <steven(at)mooij(dot)name> writes:
> testsearch=> insert into t_documentword2 (SELECT document_id, t_word2.id,
> frequency from t_documentword, t_word2 where t_documentword.word =
> t_word2.word);
> server closed the connection unexpectedly
There's not enough information here to guess what the problem is.
(But it's not table size; people routinely manipulate tables much
bigger than that in Postgres.) A stack trace from the core dump
would be really helpful, or even better a self-contained test case
that other people could replicate the failure with. See the bug
reporting guidelines at
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/static/bug-reporting.html
> I got the same result in version 7.5.15.
There is no version of Postgres named 7.5.anything.
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Lee Thompson | 2006-01-14 21:23:58 | BUG #2170: --rpath option is skipping shared libs |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2006-01-14 17:28:06 | Re: BUG #2000: psql does not prompt for password |