From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |
Date: | 2016-04-13 13:52:04 |
Message-ID: | 20591.1460555524@sss.pgh.pa.us |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I have never understood why you didn't include 64-bit atomics in the
> original atomics implementation, and I really think we should have
> committed a patch to add them long before now.
What will you do on 32-bit platforms (or, more generally, anything
lacking 64-bit-wide atomics)?
regards, tom lane
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2016-04-13 14:08:21 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-04-13 12:36:47 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql: Avoid extra locks in GetSnapshotData if old_snapshot_threshold < |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2016-04-13 13:56:43 | Re: Incomplete startup packet errors |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2016-04-13 13:50:09 | Re: pg_upgrade documentation improvement patch |